Forming Cooperative Learning Groups: The Challenge

By Howard Iver Thorsheim, Ph.D., St. Olaf College. Extensive research has repeatedly validated the value of cooperative learning. Yet, attempts to form cooperative learning groups too often failed to meet the expectations of both educators and students.

Photo © 2016 Knowledge Growers, Inc.

By Howard Iver Thorsheim, Ph.D., St. Olaf College

Howard Iver Thorsheim is Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at St. Olaf College, Northfield, Minnesota, USA. In these blogs he offers his first-person insights into effective teaching techniques gleaned from a combination of scholarly research and over 40 years in the classroom.

Extensive research* has repeatedly validated the value of cooperative learning, and many educators desire to incorporate cooperative learning into their classrooms. Yet, my attempts to form cooperative learning groups too often failed to meet the expectations of both me and my students.

It took me many tries before I developed a simple process, which was stimulated by a question from a student. The process is an effective way to form cooperative learning groups for students to work together in doing psychophysiology (that’s a favorite name I use to describe teaching and learning psychophysiology in class and lab). The process is one that I have refined and used successfully ever since.

Psychophysiology content, research methods, and learning to use technology for measurement are my goals, as well as helping students learn take-away “soft” skills that will be useful to them in any setting, like how to work cooperatively with others.

But before they could cooperate, I needed to have students get into groups. My first tries to form groups disappointed me: I tried using the class list, taking the first three people in the list to make a group, and then the next three people and made them a group, and so on.

Another time I randomly picked groups of three and assigned them to groups.

Yet another time I thought that providing choice in choosing teammates would be a good reason for success, and asked students to form their own groups of three.

None of these methods generated the kind of “special spark” I was looking for.

I was about to decide that it did not make any difference how groups were formed, and that besides, forming groups just made for more work for them and for me. Then, I decided to ask my next semester students if they had any ideas about forming cooperative groups.

In Part 2 of this blog, I’ll share what I learned and how it worked.

* Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T.,  & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 85-118. (Find an abstract of their article here). A quick way to get to that information is to download a copy of a 2013 draft version of the 2014 Johnson, Johnson & Smith article, available here.

Learn more about BIOPAC’s education solutions, including complete teaching systems for psychophysiology and the life sciences. BIOPAC also provides a wide range of research systems for recording, displaying, classifying, and analyzing psychophysiological measurements.

BIOPAC Systems, Inc. provides life science researchers and educators with data acquisition and analysis systems that inspire people and enable greater discovery about life. Visit us at www.biopac.com.

Professor Thorsheim is a licensed Psychologist, educator, and author. He has published or presented over 125 papers, journal articles, books, book chapters or monographs, and received a patent in 1985 as a co-inventor for an educational book design with interactive elements. His work has been funded by marquee foundations across the globe. His most recent work is Doing Psychophysiology: Getting Started, available from Knowledge Growers, Inc., available as an iBook download in 51 countries.

.

Dark Current Measurement as a Noise Management Tool

Noise in functional near infrared (FNIR) imaging data utilized for neurophysiological brain functioning research is a challenge to researchers, The use of dark current measurement in functional near infrared (fNIR) brain imaging can provide a valuable tool in identifying and managing certain type of noise in recordings.

By Davood Tashayyod, FNIR Devices

The use of dark current measurement in functional near infrared (fNIR) brain imaging (measurements taken not only when LED type light sources shine light at wavelengths 730 and 850 nm but also when they do not shine light (dark current condition)) can provide a valuable tool in identifying and managing certain types of noise in recordings.

Noise in functional near infrared (fNIR) imaging data utilized for neurophysiological brain functioning research is a challenge to researchers, in that excessive or unmanaged noise may pose a risk to the quality of gathered data and hence in the interpretation of the results. This noise arises from two general categories of sources, biological sources and non-biological sources. It should be noted that sources of noise are routinely present, so that noise cannot be eliminated but rather must be managed. Biological sources of noise include the respiratory and cardiac cycles and slow vasomotor oscillations. Non-biological sources of noise may include contamination from other external devices and noise induced by improper sensor application (light leakage, in the case of fNIR sensors), cable movements, or instruments or equipment used in the course of the experiment. These sources, independently or in combination, can mask the signals of interest.

Close attention to good laboratory practices, to include proper sensor placement, trial runs to establish baselines, and other techniques can help to reduce noise. Close attention to experiment protocols during the experiment can also be of assistance. However, it is in post-experiment data processing and analysis phases that the researcher has the greatest number of tools to manage noise. These tools include intuitive or visual analysis, filtering, and specialized analysis. Each method has strengths and weaknesses, but used in combination they offer a reliable method of managing noise and improving data quality.

Visual or intuitive analysis depends upon researcher experience and qualification, and some artifacts may be too small to be readily apparent. Filtering is useful, but in some range of measurements noisy data segments may be so great or may not contain any signal originated from the brain such as in the case when the sensor loses contact with the skin and captures data only from the ambient that it may not make sense to remove noise, rather such data segments should be identified and discarded.

Specialized analysis, such as dark current measurement, provide a very useful method for both identifying the noise not readily apparent to the naked eye and identifying data segments where filtering is likely to not be useful. A discussion of the use of dark current measurement can be found here.

For more information on optical braining imaging systems, visit BIOPAC’s fNIR page. BIOPAC also provides a wide range of tools for recording, displaying, classifying, and analyzing psychophysiological measurements—including EEG, ECG, EDA, PPG, and emotional states—visit BIOPAC’sapplications pages and view BIOPAC’s full line of physiology data acquisition and analysis systems, electrodes,amplifiers, and wearable, wireless transmitters and loggers.

BIOPAC Systems, Inc. provides life science researchers and educators with data acquisition and analysis systems that inspire people and enable greater discovery about life. Visit us at www.biopac.com.

Circumplex Model of Affect and Motivational State

By Alan Macy, BIOPAC Systems, Inc.

The Circumplex Model of Affect was first described in 1980 by James Russell. Affective states arise from the behavior of two independent neurophysiological systems, the arousal and valence systems. Affective states are a function of these two systems. The circumplex model is two-dimensional, with arousal and valence defined as orthogonal (perpendicular) axes. The arousal axis, plotted vertically, ranges from zero arousal to high arousal.The valence axis, plotted horizontally, ranges from negative to positive. Objective physiological indexes of affect or emotion are available. As valence examples, positive affect is indicated by increasing zygomaticus activity and negative affect is indicated by increasing corrugator activity. Physiological example indices for arousal include heart rate and electrodermal activity.

Perhaps even more fundamental to emotional state is the concept of motivational state. Motivational state is indexed by specific, bodily expressed, physiological states that can easily be measured. Motivational state is based on the concept of core relational themes, called “challenge” and “threat”.  During the course of living, humans relate to difficult environmental circumstances as a combination of challenge and threat. A challenge response is similar to the aerobic physiological response and involves increased stroke volume and cardiac output, unchanged or increased heart rate, decreased vascular resistance and relatively unchanged blood pressure. This response is indicative of efficient mobilization of available energy for coping with circumstances. A threat response is characterized by increased heart rate and blood pressure, increased or little changed vascular resistance, decreased or unchanged stroke volume and relatively unchanged cardiac output. A challenge response occurs when the subject experiences sufficient resources to meet circumstantial demands in a performance situation where goals are important. A threat response occurs when the subject experiences insufficient resources to meet those same circumstantial demands. If a circumstance is determined to be challenging, then subject performance is usually adequate. If a circumstance is determined to be threatening, then subject performance tends to worsen. Motivational state information can be used to better reflect objective differences between similar circumplex model defined emotions, such as anger and fear.

Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a physiological signal that indicates increased SNS activity. EDA is representative of changes in the electrical conductance of the skin due to eccrine (sweat) gland activity. SNS activity increases sweat gland secretions. Eccrine glands only receive activation signals from the SNS, so increased EDA is an indicator of increased arousal.

Skin temperature (SKT) changes are primarily driven by variations in blood flow. These local variations are mainly caused by changes in vascular resistance or arterial blood pressure. Local vascular resistance is modulated by smooth muscle activity, which is mediated by the SNS. SKT variation reflects SNS activity, and is an indicator of emotional state.  In particular, fingertip temperature is a marker for sympathetic induced changes in microcirculation.

Blood Volume Pulse (BVP), also referred to as the Pulse Plethysmogram (PPG), is reflective of variations in microcirculation. As vasculature resistance to flow increases, subject to increased SNS, microcirculation decreases. Accordingly a reduction in PPG (BVP) amplitude reflects increased SNS activity.

The heart and brain are connected bidirectionally via the vagus nerve. Vagal PsNS stimulation, from the brain, influences the heart via the sino-atrial (SA) node. Baroreceptor signals, from the heart, travel back along the vagus nerve to affect the brain. The SA node is the pacemaker of the heart. The SA node receives inputs from both the SNS and PsNS. The SA node can be considered to be a spike-train generator whose inter-spike (firing) interval is modulated by both SNS and PsNS activity levels. Because both SNS and PsNS activity influence SA node spike firing, heart rate behavior can be considered to be dependent on a range of emotional states. SNS activity increases heart rate and PsNS activity decreases heart rate.

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of heart rate changes over time. HRV has a frequency range of 0.003 to 0.4 Hz and is considered to have four sub-bands:  HF, LF, VLF and ULF. High frequency HRV (HF-HRV) band power is in the range of 0.18 to 0.4 Hz and reflects primarily PsNS influences. HF-HRV band power reflects modulation of vagus nerve activity, as driven by respiration. This modulation is called respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Low frequency HRV (LF-HRV) band power is in the range of 0.05-0.15 Hz and appears to reflect both SNS and PsNS influences. Very low frequency HRV (VLF-HRV) band power is in the range of 0.003-0.05 Hz and may reflect cardiovascular disease, thermo-regulatory cycles and blood plasma renin activity. Ultra low frequency HRV (ULF-HRV) band power is in the range of DC-0.003 Hz and may reflect circadian rhythm activity.

PsNS influences occur over the LF and HF frequency ranges of HRV. SNS influences drop off at about 0.15 Hz and higher. PsNS influences can affect heart rate in a fraction of a second, but SNS influences can only affect the heart rate after a few seconds. Accordingly, PsNS influences are uniquely capable of producing high speed changes in the heart rate. PsNS innervation of the heart is controlled by the right vagus nerve via the SA node. PsNS induced changes in heart rate are associated with vagal nerve activity that is modulated by respiration. Expiration causes an increase in vagal nerve activity, so heart rate decreases. Inspiration causes suppression of vagal nerve activity, so heart rate climbs back up. This combined action is known as respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). RSA is considered, in part, to be a marker for vagal control of heart rate and also for emotional regulation. Total HRV appears to be positively correlated with valence.

When attention increases, there is a short term deceleration of heart rate. Arousal is also correlated to a long term acceleration in heart rate. Heart rate also provides an indication of valence. Compared to neutral stimuli, both positive and negative stimuli first exhibit a short term decrease in heart rate. Over the long term, positive stimuli are correlated with an increase in heart rate while negative stimuli usually are correlated to a decrease in heart rate.

Respiratory activity occurs via periodic contraction and relaxation of respiratory muscles, including the diaphragm, intercostal and abdominal muscles. The motor outputs for controlling respiration are generated by efferent neurons in the spinal cord.  There are autonomic and voluntary breathing pathways to these respiratory-related efferent neurons. A variety of afferent (sensory) inputs influence respiratory rate and tidal volume in support of the body’s metabolic demands. SNS activity increases respiratory rate and PsNS activity reduces respiratory rate.

Several EEG studies suggest that emotional valence is linked to frontal lobe activation, typically indexed by alpha power. Positive valence is correlated to increased activation of  the left frontal lobe and negative valence is correlated to increased activation of the right frontal lobe.  Other studies have suggested that frontal lobe EEG activation asymmetry reflects the relative balance of motivational state, more so than emotional valence.  In this work, enhanced left frontal lobe activation predicted dispositional states towards challenge and enhanced right frontal lobe activation predicted dispositional states towards threat.

Artwork adapted from from Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.

For more information on BIOPAC’s wide range of tools for recording, displaying, classifying, and analyzing psychophysiological measurements—including EEG, ECG, EDA, PPG, and emotional states—visit BIOPAC’s applications pages and view BIOPAC’s full line of physiology data acquisition and analysis systems, electrodes, amplifiers, and wearable, wireless transmitters and loggers.

BIOPAC Systems, Inc. provides life science researchers and educators with data acquisition and analysis systems that inspire people and enable greater discovery about life. Visit us at www.biopac.com.

 

error: Content is protected !!